Page 247 - Haematologica Vol. 107 - September 2022
P. 247

LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Table 2. Capacity of the tested models to predict venous thromboembolic events.
        TiC
 GRS
 CRS
 FVL+PT
 FVL+PT+CRS
 AUC
0.781 (0.72-0.84)
0.615 (0.54-0.69)
0.756 (0.70-0.82)
0.506 (0.43-0.58)
0.757 (0.70-0.82)
 P
  <0.001
  0.002
  <0.001
  0.869
  <0.001
 Sensitivity
68.5 (56.6-78.9) 50/73
52.1 (40.0-63.9) 38/73
71.2 (59.4-81.2) 52/73
-
65.8 (53.7-76.5) 48/73
 Specificity
 76.7 (71.3-81.5) 214/279
 72.0 (66.4-72.2) 201/279
 62.7 (56.8-68.4) 175/279
 -
 74.9 (69.4-79.9) 209/279
 PPV
 43.5 (34.3-53.0) 50/115
 32.8 (24.3-42.1) 38/116
 33.3 (26.0-41.3) 52/156
 -
 40.7 (31.7-50.1) 48/118
 NPV
 90.3 (85.8-93.7) 214/237
 85.2 (80.0-89.5) 201/236
 89.3 (84.1-93.2) 175/196
 -
 89.3 (84.6-93.0) 209/234
 LR+
 2.94
 1.87
 1.91
 -
 2.63
 LR-
  0.41
  0.67
  0.46
  -
  0.46
 OR
7.16 (4.06-12.61)
2.80 (1.65-4.75)
4.17 (2.38-7.31)
-
5.73 (3.29-9.79)
    'P' refers to the significance against a random model of area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.5. Numbers (in parentheses) are 95% confidence intervals. TiC: thrombo inCode score; GRS: genetic risk score; CRS: clinical risk score; FVL+PT: Factor V Leiden and prothrombin mutations; FVL+PT +CRS: Factor V Leiden and prothrombin mutations plus clinical risk score; PPV: positive predictive value; NPV: negative predictive value; LR: likelihood ratio; OR: odds ratio.
 risk variants assessed is the A1 allele or haplotype for ABO blood type; the risk of VTE for A1 allele carriers is esti- mated to be increased by ~1.8 fold,5 and has also been significantly associated with different indicators of COVID- 19 severity.14
Certain clinical variables are associated with an increased risk of VTE, and different studies report a better capacity
to predict VTE when genetic and clinical variables are combined.8 In agreement with this, the present results show that the best predictive capacity was obtained when taking both into account - i.e., when using the TiC score (Figure 1). The results also show that the correlation be- tween the risk estimates provided by the CRS and GRS models alone was not significant (b=0.039; P=0.6). These
Haematologica | 107 September 2022
2246
Figure 1. Predictive capacity of the different models. ROC curves are shown for each model: model with clinical variables only (M_CLIN); model with genetic variables only (M_GRS); and the combination of both models (M_TOTAL or TiC).































   245   246   247   248   249