Page 198 - 2019_01-Haematologica-web

C. Tromeur et al.
embolism in pregnancy. Respirology.
2011;16(Suppl 1):37-86.
43. Ma HY, Jia CP, Moadel R, Freeman LR.
Evaluation for pulmonary emboli in pregnan-
cy. Clin Nucl Med. 2014;Conference: 313.
44. Ma HY, Natenzon A, Sheen J-J, et al. Evaluation of pulmonary emboli in pregnan-
cy. J Nucl Med. 2015;Conference.
45. Nijkeuter M, Tan M, Middeldorp S, Kroft LJM, Beenen L, Huisman MV. Safety of rul- ing out pulmonary embolism (PE) in preg- nancy by computed tomography pul- monary angiography (CTPA). J Thromb
Haemost. 2013;Conference:130.
46. Potton EC, Marsh S, Hasford C. Incidence of non-diagnostic CT pulmonary angiography images in the pregnant population: a 4-year
experience. Thorax. 2009;Conference:A88.
47. Roseverne L, Schembri G, Roach P. Value of ventilation SPECT scintigraphy in pregnant patients with suspected PE. Intern Med J.
2011;Conference(var.pagings):16.
48. Slim I, Ben GT, Yeddes I, et al. Lung perfu- sion scintigraphy: diagnostic utility of pul- monary embolism during pregnancy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;Conference:
S484.
49. Tomas HS, Phillips J, Bebbington N,
Ogunremi T, Guest P. Investigating pul- monary embolism (PE) in pregnancy: single photon emission computed tomography ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy (SPECT VQ). Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013;Conference:S386.
50. Vanes NK, O'Connor H, Baillie P, Sinha A. Diagnosis and management of suspected venous thromboembolism in pregnancy: Experience in a birmingham maternity unit. Arc Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2014;Conference:A125.
51. Ezwawah O, Alkoteesh J, Barry JE, Ryan M. Pulmonary embolism in pregnancy: is nuclear medicine imaging still a valid option? Ir Med J. 2008;101(9):281-284.
52. Armstrong L, Gleeson F, Mackillop L, Mutch S, Beale A. Survey of UK imaging practice for the investigation of pulmonary embolism in pregnancy. Clin Radiol. 2017;72(8):696-701.
53. Golfam M, Pham X, Samaan S, Moher D. Optimization of lung scintigraphy in preg- nant women at the Ottawa Hospital, Canada. J Nucl Med. 2017;58(Suppl1):1209.
54. Mitchell DP, Rowan M, Loughman E, Ridge CA, MacMahon PJ. Contrast monitoring techniques in CT pulmonary angiography: An important and underappreciated contrib- utor to breast dose. Eur J Radiol. 2017;86: 184-189.
55. Sheen JJ, Haramati LB, Natenzon A, et al. Performance of low dose perfusion scintig- raphy and CT pulmonary angiography for pulmonary embolism in pregnancy. Chest. 2018;153(1):152-160.
56. Yeo JH, Zhou L, Lim R. Indeterminate CT pulmonary angiogram: why and does it matter? J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2017;61(1):18-23.
57. Halpenny D, Park B, Alpert J, et al. Low dose computed tomography pulmonary angiog- raphy protocol for imaging pregnant patients: can dose reduction be achieved without reducing image quality? Clinical Imaging. 2017;44:101-105.
58. Chatterson LC, Leswick DA, Fladeland DA, Hunt MM, Webster S, Lim H. Fetal shielding combined with state of the art CT dose reduction strategies during maternal chest CT. Eur J Radiol. 2014;83(7):1199-1204.
59. Chatterson LC, Leswick DA, Fladeland DA, Hunt MM, Webster ST. Lead versus bis- muth-antimony shield for fetal dose reduc- tion at different gestational ages at CT pul- monary angiography. Radiology. 2011;260 (2):560-567.
60. Doshi SK, Negus IS, Oduko JM. Fetal radia- tion dose from CT pulmonary angiography in late pregnancy: a phantom study. Br J Radiol. 2008;81(968):653-658.
61. Hurwitz LM, Yoshizumi T, Reiman RE, et al. Radiation dose to the fetus from body MDCT during early gestation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186(3):871-876.
62. Iball GR, Kennedy EV, Brettle DS. Modelling the effect of lead and other materials for shielding of the fetus in CT pulmonary angiography. Br J Radiol. 2008;81(966):499- 503.
63. Kennedy EV, Iball GR, Brettle DS. Investigation into the effects of lead shield- ing for fetal dose reduction in CT pulmonary angiography. Br J Radiol. 2007;80(956):631- 638.
64. Litmanovich D, Tack D, Lin P-J, Boiselle PM, Raptopoulos V, Bankier AA. Female breast, lung, and pelvic organ radiation from dose- reduced 64-MDCT thoracic examination protocols: a phantom study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197(4):929-934.
65. Perisinakis K, Seimenis I, Tzedakis A, Damilakis J. Perfusion scintigraphy versus 256-slice CT angiography in pregnant patients suspected of pulmonary embolism: comparison of radiation risks. J Nucl Med. 2014;55(8):1273-1280.
66. Winer-Muram HT, Boone JM, Brown HL, Jennings SG, Mabie WC, Lombardo GT. Pulmonary embolism in pregnant patients:
fetal radiation dose with helical CT.
Radiology. 2002;224(2):487-492.
67. Isidoro J, Gil P, Costa G, Pedroso de Lima J, Alves C, Ferreira NC. Radiation dose com- parison between V/P-SPECT and CT- angiography in the diagnosis of pulmonary
embolism. Phys Med. 2017;41:93-96.
68. Motavalli LR, Azghadi EH, Hakimabad HM, Akhlaghi P. Pulmonary embolism in preg- nant patients: assessing organ dose to preg- nant phantom and its fetus during lung
imaging. Med Phys. 2017;44(11):6038-6046. 69. McCollough CH, Schueler BA, Atwell TD, et al. Radiation exposure and pregnancy: when should we be concerned?
Radiographics. 2007;27(4):909-917.
70. van Mens TE, Scheres LJ, de Jong PG, Leeflang MM, Nijkeuter M, Middeldorp S. Imaging for the exclusion of pulmonary embolism in pregnancy. Cochrane Database
Syst Rev. 2017;1:CD011053.
71. Dronkers CEA, van der Hulle T, Le Gal G, et
al. Towards a tailored diagnostic standard for future diagnostic studies in pulmonary embolism: communication from the SSC of the ISTH. J Thromb Haemost. 2017;15(5): 1040-1043.
72. van der Hulle T, Cheung WY, Kooij S, et al. Simplified diagnostic management of sus- pected pulmonary embolism (the YEARS study): a prospective, multicentre, cohort study. Lancet. 2017;390(10091):289-297.
73. Konstantinides SV, Torbicki A, Agnelli G, et al. 2014 ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(43):3033-3080.
74. Leung AN, Bull TM, Jaeschke R, et al. American Thoracic Society documents: an official American Thoracic Society/Society of Thoracic Radiology clinical practice guideline--evaluation of suspected pul- monary embolism in pregnancy. Radiology. 2012;262(2):635-646.
75. Burton KR, Park AL, Fralick M, Ray JG. Risk of early onset breast cancer among women exposed to thoracic computed tomography in pregnancy or early postpartum. J Thromb Haemost. 2018;16(5):876-885.
76. Schueller-Weidekamm C, Schaefer-Prokop CM, Weber M, Herold CJ, Prokop M. CT angiography of pulmonary arteries to detect pulmonary embolism: improvement of vas- cular enhancement with low kilovoltage set- tings. Radiology. 2006;241(3):899-907.
77. Shahir K, McCrea JM, Lozano LA, Goodman LR. Reduced z-axis technique for CT Pulmonary angiography in pregnancy-- validation for practical use and dose reduc- tion. Emerg Radiol. 2015;22(6):651-656.
188
haematologica | 2019; 104(1)