Page 56 - 2022_01-Haematologica-web
P. 56

Editorials
better response to treatment and overall survival than chil- dren with less severe SAA.9 Unfortunately, baseline lym- phocyte counts in that study were not available. We could hypothesize that similar mechanisms could explain dis- crepant results between young children and adult patients.
The data in the present study could also become a sup- portive tool to approach children and young adults with SAA who lack a matched sibling donor. The management of newly diagnosed pediatric and young adult SAA patients could be based on the following algorithm (Figure 1D): when baseline blood values are predictive of a unsat- isfactory response to IST combined with eltrombopag, and the chance of rapidly finding a suitable alternative donor exists, upfront first-line HCT with this alternative donor should be taken in serious consideration. Future research in this field should be directed at identifying fac- tors predicting long-term outcome, which would bring more precise information to adapt up-front treatment strategies.
Disclosures
No conflicts of interest to disclose.
Contributions
AT, RPL, CD and AR wrote the mansucript.
References
1. Scheinberg P, Wu CO, Nunez O, Young NS. Predicting response to immunosuppressive therapy and survival in severe aplastic anaemia.
Br J Haematol. 2009;144(2):206-216.
2. Assi R, Garcia-Manero G, Ravandi F, et al. Addition of eltrombopag
to immunosuppressive therapy in patients with newly diagnosed
aplastic anemia. Cancer. 2018;124(21):4192-4201.
3. Townsley DM, Scheinberg P, Winkler T, et al. Eltrombopag added to
standard immunosuppression for aplastic anemia. N Engl J Med.
2017;376(16):1540-1550.
4. Zaimoku Y, Patel BA, Shalhoub R, et al. Predicting response of severe
aplastic anemia to immunosuppression combined with eltrombopag.
Haematologica. 2021;107(1):126-133.
5. Tichelli A, de Latour RP, Passweg J, et al. Long-term outcome of a ran-
domized controlled study in patients with newly diagnosed severe aplastic anemia treated with antithymocyte globulin and cyclosporine, with or without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: a Severe Aplastic Anemia Working Party trial from the European Group of Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Haematologica. 2020;105(5):1223-1231.
6. Yang S, Yuan X, Ma R, et al. Comparison of outcomes of frontline immunosuppressive therapy and frontline haploidentical hematopoi- etic stem cell transplantation for children with severe aplastic anemia who lack an HLA-matched sibling donor. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019;25(5):975-980.
7. Dufour C, Pillon M, Passweg J, et al. Outcome of aplastic anemia in adolescence: a survey of the Severe Aplastic Anemia Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Haematologica. 2014;99(10):1574-1581.
8. Dufour C, Veys P, Carraro E, et al. Similar outcome of upfront-unre- lated and matched sibling stem cell transplantation in idiopathic pae- diatric aplastic anaemia. A study on behalf of the UK Paediatric BMT Working Party, Paediatric Diseases Working Party and Severe Aplastic Anaemia Working Party of EBMT. Br J Haematol. 2015;171(4):585-594.
9. Fuhrer M, Rampf U, Baumann I, et al. Immunosuppressive therapy for aplastic anemia in children: a more severe disease predicts better survival. Blood. 2005;106(6):2102-2104.
10.de Latour RP, Risitano A, Dufour C. Severe Aplastic Anemia and PNH. In: Carreras E, Dufour C, Mohty M, Kroger N, editors. The EBMT Handbook: Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapies. 7th edition. Cham (CH): 2019. p. 579-585.
48
haematologica | 2022; 107(1)


































































































   54   55   56   57   58